Latest Entries »

Well the news from my home town is that we had a visit from Professor Germaine Greer and took ourselves off to hear her talk on the subject of Feminism Forty Years On.  I think that I was looking for some insightful observations on female culture today.  The very young women I see at lectures wear eyelashes heavier than handbags and are daubed in heavy make up designed to foster similarity not difference.   They come dressed (even the very chubby ones) for pole dancing not learning and they dont like to talk but will text text text.   Deeper investigation reveals they have come to Uni for a few years, might get a job, would like a fella with a car, his own place and money, would like to go to Dubai and will probably get breast enhancements (even the very chubby ones) for their twenty first.  Depressingly, it struck me that this was not so different from the buttoned up 1950's Stepford type wife conforming to male idealised manifestations of what it is to be a woman.  So, at that stage in the life cycle, maybe not much has changed.  Germaine Greer I thought would have something to say about this and maybe about the perennial plain Janes left happily alone to wear warm clothes and read and talk…. and about the depressing fact that it is a visual difference that divides women,,,still….. 

My friend, older than me, younger than Greer thought that everything had changed.  She was villified in the 60's for going back to her profession and putting her son in nursery to do so.  The other mothers didnt like her for it and the men at work didnt like her for it, the women at work couldn't understand why she would do it.  She has always worn what she liked and she has worked and she thought Greer might have something to say about women's changing identities, ageing, women being kinder to other women……. but no….

Greer started off with an insult, what were the hot issues (said with a sneer) in our suburban nowhere ? and went on to lambast women.  She cited a woman in the press who has blamed the failure of her business on her beauty.  Greer believes the woman is a) deluded as she just isn't that good looking and b) suffering from a Cinderella complex in which everyone around her is ugly to her because she is beautiful and c) unable to make friends and build teams and that that probably explains the failure of the business.  Margaret Thatcher too couldnt make friends and build teams, she said, and was vain, wore high heels for work ( God Forbid !) and used her sexuality to win political points.  Katie Price, now she is worried yes really Germaine Greer said that she fears that Katie Price with her addiction to surgery just wont be able to make the transition to middle age.   Oh and breasts, yes breasts.  Why are bras made with two equally sized pockets, she wondered, when no woman has exactly symmetrical breasts.  It's all a male conspiracy no doubt….what about tights ? are our legs equal and our buttocks, what about pants ?  Move over Mary Portas Profesor Germaine Greer Uncovers the Great Knicker Conspiracy.    When something like half the world's women still dont have clean water and 67 million children dont have a school to go to is this really what she wants to use her platform for ?

She told us to stop wiping surfaces.  This wasn't a metaphor.  She is still telling women to get out of the kitchen.  The male students she shares her home with eat their dinner and go down the pub…the women faff, wasting important talking and drinking time wiping surfaces.  This is evidence apparently.   She says work is a male, hierarchical boys club world, even publishing, the woman who published an essay of hers in a book recently without permission ( an essay which she feels was used exploitatively as she described having been raped in the essay) must have been told to do so by a more senior male !  More evidence from the Professor of male domination.   Women obviously can never make bad decisions nor exploit each other shrewdly for good business reasons.

I have been a lawyer, a lecturer, worked with multi nationals and SME's, run my own business and advised others and that world just doesn't sound like anywhere I have ever worked.   I have had a cleaner and ironer for twenty years.  I have known horrible men and women and mostly have met lovely human beings, kind, good people who like other people.   I have my own home, car, wage ,,,,, my husband is more than able with a dishcloth, mop and tagine ! I enjoy the quiet time I have some nights with my yellow sponge and granite worktops when everyone else has gone to bed.  I am not alone.  Women I know work because we have to or want to and not because we are making a statement of political empowerment.  Some of us have been doing this for years.  Most of us are able to do it because we have ability and have built friendships and teams in which we support each other to do it.  We are not beauty obsessed, male repressed nor suffering low self esteem.  Gender is not a determinant of anything for us.   We outsource what we can and we share what's left, constantly adapting to changing environments.  We keep up.  Some of us even manage to make the transition clever girls, ( the Madonnas and Gagas and Katie Prices of this world) into a brand and to sell the experience in the process.   

Oh and for the record she went into the BIg Brother House to get money for her environmental work in Australia and she came out after just a few days because others were being mean to John McCririck who, she says, has a disability and was being mocked for it.  Thanks for sharing that.   Forty years on Professor Greer, and it's sad that you still need me to know how wonderful you are.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

DAMIEN HIRST

 

I am obsessed with art lately.  I keep looking and looking at colour and wishing I could paint.   After the Hockeny exhibition something in me wants to make something beautiful.   And now,  after having seen the programmes on Damien Hirst – the one with Noel Fielding and the one with the BBC – I want to make (and for me that probably means say in a poem) something meaningful. 

You can't really describe Hirst's work as visually beautiful – it's gross, extreme.  There are instances of great beauty with the colour in the spot paintings, the butterflies or the pills lined up in cabinets, the repetition and the differences are beautiful together, I think, but after seeing the programmes I came away really believing that there is great authenticity in what he does. 

He talked about his pharmacy installation.  I remember feeling sick being in that installation at the TATE Liverpool years ago.  I didnt understand it, I couldnt read it the way art critics do but he made me feel nauseous and crushed in there.   Now, years later I heard him talking about it and saying, in such down to earth words, that art can make you well.  He doesnt get it that there were people out there who dont know they can be healed (not his word – so loaded now with spirituality and costly quacky interventions) by art.  A sceptic might shout Yeah if you had cancer you'd go for Chemotherapy not to an art gallery.  Why not both ?   

Hirst also talked about money. How ridiculous it is to get millions for something you have made; a cow hacked in half with a chain saw in a pool of formaldehyde or a shark in a tank.  He said he was in the pub with his mate playing snooker when phone calls were coming through telling him of the multi millions being paid at auction for his work.   For a while the money blocked him but he said his partner told him to think of it as a resource for making art and that is what he did.  Her words helped him think of it the way a painter might think about tins of paint.   Then, he made the skull, the diamond encrusted abhorrently blingy skull, thinking he would sink 40 million into it.  No sooner had he done that than he was offered 50 million for it.  There's bad stuff in the world and he was responding to it.  " For the Love of God"  His titles are like poems themselves.  His work is dark, ironic but, like Lousie Bourgeois' work, when he shows me what hurts him I believe him.

hockney

Did you see the Andrew Marr programme on David Hockney's exhibition at the Royal Academy ?  I wish I had seen it before I saw the paintings. 

Hockney talked about how hard you have to look at a thing to see it.  His colours are amazing and the scale of his work fills your eyes.  Towards the end of the programme he talked about craft, about being a painter, painting with hand and heart and head.  He said that you can teach the craft but you cant teach the honesty that has to go in there…….he called that poetry……

He talked about space.  His paintings are about how we move through space and how the same scene changes and changes over time.   He said the most interesting space is where I end and you begin.   Poems live in that space, I think.   Where I end and you begin.

news from home…….

One of the things I like best about poetry is how difficult it is to describe.  Don Paterson's essays in Poetry Review last year came close to capturing what it is that makes a piece of writing a poem.  

Classrooms, workshops on poems, remind us (often depressingly as we spend what seems like an age labouring over someone's best efforts) how much of our work looks and sounds like it might be a poem…..but something in us just knows that it isn't poetry.   

A visiting priest in my home town talked to our assembled congregation last Sunday about knowledge; how dangerous it is to think that we know something or even fully know each other….. he talked about husbands and wives always being open to learn new and more things about each other.   He was talking about learning as a life force and it struck me that all that he was saying about learning could be said about poetry.   He quoted a writer called Kevin Nicholls who said that   "it starts in wonder, goes on in humility and ends in gratitude".

If a poem doesn't invoke a sense of wonder, awe, curiosity in me so that I want to go on, smaller than the poem trying to find something and thankful at its end that I have and wanting to read it all over again – with even greater wonder -…..then it isnt a poem.  Maybe. 

Leave a comment please.

news from my home town…….foxes

                                                                                  

Walking late last night back home up the hill from a friend's house I met a fox.  He, I like to think he was he, was muscular and his tail running out in a straight line with his spine was like a sumptuous rug rolled, fibres out, for a journey.     He stopped to look at me.  He stood under a street light, exposed, on the pavement close to the sandstone wall.   He was bigger than a dog and longer from nose to tail tip, than a metre.  His ears were softly erect and he dipped his head to one side as though he wanted to listen.  I dipped my head.  I wanted to listen.  The orange light showered down through the damp air so that he looked as if he were made of mosaic tiles of copper, as though rain might ting on him.

If I had taken the car, I would have missed him.  And I would have missed the way the new frost made the pavements glitter around him.  I would have missed the chances I had to make, unwittingly, the small decisions we all make about when to move, where to walk,  where to cross, what tune to hum.  I felt the fox was a visitation.  I sang out loud to him a song I remembered from my childhood but didn't know I still knew.  My soul is filled with joy as I sing to God my saviour He has looked upon his servant He has visited his people and Holy is His name, through all generations, everlasting is His Mercy to the people He has chosen and Holy is His name. 

The fox waited for me to finish then bolted up and over the wall, his tail not touching anything.  I wondered where he would go, where would he lay down and let his tail curl about him ?  Would there be a vixen and cubs waiting in a hole somewhere up in the woods on the hill for his return.   I feel sure when something lifts someone, when one human is visited, then the whole of humanity is strengthened.  Strange, that being so alone with the fox in the cold, dark night ju st a few hundred yards from home I felt connected to everything.

This seems to be the time of year when people in my home town and globally go about congratulating each other and themselves on their wonderful successes.   Red carpets are rolled out in Hollywood and in my home town poets name the competitions in which their poem was highly commended or shortlisted.   They tell me the names of other poets who like their work as though this will persuade me to join that Happy Band of Brothers –  and I am happy for them.  I have done it myself.  Who hasn't put a blurb on their book from someone whose name we all know or visited a web site repeatedly to see their name in (their own) fonts !  

But how much better it would have been if we had waited for someone else to notice and mention our success to us, or not.  The vast majority of the poetry I read, poems that have truly changed me (and I am not just talking about feeling moved by something….  I believe the science of neuroplasticity can prove that our brains are changed, physically, structurally changed by the stimuli we expose them to)  go unmentioned to anyone else, let alone their poets.  I get the chance to gush now and then but mostly, as poets we don't get or give much feedback.  Reviews are few and far between and far from democratic.   

In my home town the poets I know continue to tell me when I ask them how's their writing going, the list of their near misses, as if  just getting a mention deserves a mention ?  Is our self esteem so low ?  And when did self esteem become the measure of anything ?  I am no stranger to self help, there's a holistic health centre in my home town where I have spent many an hour and tenner getting needles stuck in me or stress massaged out of me.   I have  done Mars, Venus, Chicken Soup, Celestine, Yoga, power walking, running, Buddhist meditation, mindful eating and chanting and I have single handedly propped up the practices of many self employed gurus trading from rented rooms with  dusty surfaces bearing tea lights and tissues……and even I am beginning to conclude that self esteem is overrated.   It's had its day as the root cause or label for our inherent unhappiness……I am going to back off, not give it house room, stop thinking about self esteem and success and continue - as one therapist put it – to stir the mud.    I prefer to think of  that hole in the centre of me…….that utter emptiness that sometimes swells up and might choke me….not as hole I need to fill with compliments fished from friends ………………but as the space where the poems come in.   

 

news from my home town……

I have been listening again to Garrison Keillor and thinking about the ordinary everyday stuff of our lives that literature is made of,,….

 

The news from my home town this week is that some of the trees are down, some are not.  I particularly like the greying spruces lolling unlit in my neighbours windows.  Their sitting rooms must smell piny and their hoover bags will be bursting with needles and spewing out the smell of woodland floors in other rooms.   These trees confirm something I think I have always known…not many deadlines are deadlines.   Up on the hill the wind has taken down the old and woody and in the woods our usual tracks are lost among shrapnel ends of broken branches.  The dog loves it.  She gambols over sticks and into undergrowth, emerging with twigs as hair clips and bobbles.   I like the space up there in the winter.  The trees are further apart than you think and the light comes in.  It's so bright the sea looks dull.  It's communal up there…..a well kept secret in my home town is the view out to the sea, the island with its single windmill generator and the sand bank beyond where the seal colony basks.  Sometimes if you listen carefully and the wind is just right you can hear them calling.

 

"Sidereal" by Rachael Boast, Picador

Still reading this one…it's very new.  It seems to have a maturity about it and I can see the similarity with Kathy Towers work…she was from Picador with The Floating Man.   There's a lightness of touch, a gentleness and transcendence in both their  work but it's also contemporary.   I feel that many of the poems work with and against each other and maybe don't even need their own separate titles.  It's definitely a collection, that's a strength and I love this about it.   I get the sense that when something grips her then it is going to be in every poem for a while….that's happening here.  If what matters really matters then surely its going to be there in every poem of that period.  Why when there is all this other stuff out there is Waterstones still packing its shelves with a proliferation of Carol Ann ?   

 

"The Bees"  by Carol Ann Duffy

I loved Rapture, it's one of my all time best ever books but I am not sure about The Bees.   Maybe the expectation set was so high because of her back catalogue that this feels disappointingly like more of the same.   Once upon a time Lenny Henry was an alternative comic; edgy, radical, daring to say things….now he is advertising a cheap hotel chain. 

Look how Andrew Motion's The Cinder Path was such a strong come back book after his laureateship ( I re read it over Christmas and love The Mower).  Look at what Paul Farley and Michael Symons Roberts did with Edgelands and look how Simon Armitage went off translating Gawain and making films and then came back with Seeing Stars.  I really respect how he manages his own development and stretches and challenges himself.   In yoga class we have a strap line…….there is time and space for everything.

 

"The Best Poetry of 2011" from Salt  series editor Roddy Lumsden

I love love love this book and found myself sneering and jeering at the Forward Book in comparison.  Forward seems so stuffy and worthy.  If……huge IF…..I had had the chance to be in either.  ( and I am just talking anthology of the year here and not cocking a snoop at a Forward Prize) … then I would prefer to be in the Salt book.  Please Roddy  Lumsden – pick me !  I love Giles Goodland's poem in there ( he pipped me to the post at Cardiff competition..well done to him ) and the book is full of other energetic and lively work.  The biography pages at the back are great and I enjoyed that the poems are presented in a way that shows where they first appeared.   There were lots from Poetry London and Magma.  All credit to their editors for the work they promoted over the year.  The Rialto featured too and noticeable by its ommission was The North, though Nina Boyd, a Poetry Business winner, did make the cut from a poem she placed elsewhere.     

Deryn Rees Jones'  poem in the Salt Book is beautiful.  I dont have  it with me to quote from it accurately but some phrases won't go away  "the corridors are singing with your hurt"    "unhook, undo" .  It reminded me of Macneice part X of Trilogy for X " and love hung still as crystal over the entire room".  She has a collection forthcoming Burying the Wren and it will be a highlight of 2012 for me.  I hope the Salt book encourages people to support the magazines too.  I will have to send out to them if I want to be in next year's Salt….Sasha Dugdale will be editing.   I try and buy Poetry London and Magma from bookstores but that gets harder and harder since the demise of Borders.   I will have to subscribe.

 

"The Collected Michael Murphy"  Shoestring Press

Although I knew most of this work from other places I enjoyed reading this book front to back.  I think the introductory comments from poets close to Michael made the work more intimate.    It feels earthy and manly, definitely an outdoors poet…..all the more heart rending then when his landscape is reduced to the walls around him and the window and blinds of his bedroom.    I bought my own copy in Waterstones and went back to get more for friends only to be told that they had never stocked the book at all.    Crazy.  Get it from Shoestring…..and the Collected Matt Simpson too.

 

"Of All Places" by John McAuliffe

This beautiful book is from The Gallery Press, Ireland.   I had seen some of the poems before, in the Smith Doorstop Pamphlet "A Midgie" or in Poetry Review or The North but seeing them again here, with their relatives, changed them.  I have my favourites,; Badgers, Continuity, Bringing the Baby to Rossaveal  seem to go together, to bubble under with trouble, an externalised trouble, and with sadness that this is how it is.   Best of all I like the poems that don't remind me of anyone but John McAuliffe and for me, they include A Name, A Midgie, Continuity, Snow and Of All Places.  I have only had this book a week – John read from it as part of the Manchester Literature Festival on Monday 17th October and I it's really too soon to be saying anything at all and too important for the saying to be done by me.  I will wait for the big reviews it deserves.

 

Linda Chase's Not Many Love Poems, Carcanet

This one is growing with me.  I think the poems need reading aloud.  I can hear them.  I can hear her.  "Dare" is the best I think….. all that restraint.  It shudders with life and people clinging to it.

Michael Murphy

 

I missed the celebration of Michael's work and Matt Simpson's work at Liverpool Bluecoat.

I am so sorry I missed it and hope there'll be another event maybe next May.

 

There is a most beautiful poem in Poetry Review from Michael.  

I love the image of the child bringing toys to his Dad on the bed and not knowing this is a pyre he is building.  

It's called "Turf".  Read it and weep.

Kei Miller

Last night I heard Kei Miller read at Liverpool's Bluecoat.   He is a Carcanet poet.   Not since Matt Welton, or maybe not since Lorraine Mariner have I been so refreshed, so thoroughly blessed and uplifted.  He gives himself.

I was thinking of going home at half time but I am so lucky that I stayed after the poets I came to hear had finished their slots to listen to this man I had never heard of.    I bought two copies of the book.   One for me and one to give away when the occasion presents itself.  I read and read and I trawl the publishers "our authors" pages imagining my name on their lists and wondering who I would sit next to on the screen.  How can I have missed this poet ? 

His Light Song of Light is a beautiful piece,  He has a storytelling gift and uses the musicality of language to bring depth – deep things are simple, not heavy heavy heavy, there is not artifice with him,  I love

" Blindness……………..

is, at once, the absence and great excess of light -  the belly

of a cave and its opening "

 

from Some Definitions for Light (1) Kei Miller 2010

read his book(s) and post a comment.